Search

Leslie Vigil

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
74 matches · 39W–35L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.13
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
6%
stay 3.0
94%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 43% stay · 57% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.01. Lower than today’s 3.13 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
22 of 213
WA · 3.0
81 of 960

Leslie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Leslie has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Leslie has gone from the 13th to the 89th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
53.2%
25W–22L · 52.5% of games
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 47.6% of games
6.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 58.5% of games
6.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 47.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history74 matches
L
Alexis Chen
2026-06-06 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.004about as expected — took 38% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Brittany Caldwell / Laura Bouma
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Janice Walters
0.024below expectation — took 44% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Chenxi Lu
2026-05-31 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.041better than expected — took 100% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
Lindy Mense / Pondra Perkins
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keiko Aikawa
+0.036better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Kristy Kowalczyk
2026-05-22 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.027better than expected — took 56% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Marie Wang
2026-05-16 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.058better than expected — took 80% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-08 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.011about as expected — took 65% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Yunting Li / Ailiu Wu
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Wilson
+0.014better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-25 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.027below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Molly Scott / Lauren Stillwell
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jena Wahl
+0.021better than expected — took 52% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
Diane Lee / Vandella Stewart
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leona Zamora
+0.014better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Iva Naffziger
+0.003better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.