Search

Emilie Purhar

Kenmore, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
82 matches · 25W–57L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.45
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
73%
stay 2.5
27%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 93% stay · 7% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.38. Lower than today’s 2.45 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 2.5
38 of 57

Emilie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Emilie has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.02.53.0201920202021202220252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Emilie has gone from the 25th to the 3rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 53.9% of games
3.0
20.9%
9W–34L · 39% of games
6.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 40.9% of games
6.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history82 matches
L
Myoungju Baek / Stephen Waltarmixed
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Danny Lin
+0.000below expectation — took 35% of games against 48% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
Jenny Sorensen / Haakon Sorensenmixed
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Santhosh Bomma
+0.000better than expected — took 53% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Wei Zhan / Jingxian Wang
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Turino
0.042below expectation — took 55% of games against 69% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Vitida Robinson / Caiping Zang
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Teresa Martinez
0.004about as expected — took 40% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Letitia Selk / Helen Chatalas
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Teresa Martinez
0.010about as expected — took 57% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-5
W
Jia Tang / Jane Vail
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Yen Nguyen
0.038below expectation — took 41% of games against 60% expected
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Yu Feng / Evelyn Liu
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Vandella Stewart
0.017about as expected — took 53% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
Mary Jordan / Sheila Loekito
2026-03-13 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Teresa Martinez
+0.041better than expected — took 71% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Iva Naffziger / Leslie Vigil
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lee Darrow
0.003below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-0
W
Gwynne Laurente / Sondra Laurent-Michel
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Turino
0.020about as expected — took 60% of games against 65% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Nina Moorad / Jenny Ott
2026-01-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy McPherson
+0.004about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Sharon Solie / Gesina Howard
2026-01-17 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Carisa Betancourt
+0.013better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.