Search

Mary Jordan

Seattle, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
57 matches · 24W–33L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.50
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
49%
stay 2.5
51%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 84% stay · 16% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.42. Lower than today’s 2.50 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 2.5
5 of 17
WA · 2.5
40 of 81

Mary is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mary has played at 3.0, 2.5 across 5 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.02.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Mary has gone from the 11th to the 30th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
55.6%
10W–8L · 48.9% of games
3.0
37%
10W–17L · 44.7% of games
6.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 39% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history57 matches
L
Abby Miller / Renee Pitra
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Judith Ma
0.054below expectation — took 14% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Dana Day / Jenjira Hellers
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sarah Gardner
0.021below expectation — took 44% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
D Shibata / Julie Natsis
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Susan Tamcsin
+0.014better than expected — took 68% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Suzanne Lance
2026-04-12 · #1 Singles · 2.5
0.101below expectation — took 8% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-04-03 · #1 Singles · 2.5
+0.126better than expected — took 100% of games against 38% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Xuechu Zhou / Rae Infante
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Claire Todd
0.043below expectation — took 37% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Michelle Warren / Alexandra Tibbetts
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sheila Loekito
0.037below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Emilie Purhar / Teresa Martinez
2026-03-13 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sheila Loekito
0.025below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Rachel Martin / Mary Cropp
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jenny Davidson
0.019below expectation — took 55% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 5-5
W
Lisa Collins / Nicole Lew
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sheila Loekito
+0.014about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Sandra Cullen / Jenny Wilson
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sheila Loekito
0.028below expectation — took 58% of games against 67% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Christina Ntouniaoglou / Cecilia Verastegui
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carol Markham
+0.055better than expected — took 75% of games against 47% expected
6-0, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.