Teams

BETC-Jordan

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.57 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-24vs FC-Respect Your Elders-PitraLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Jordan / Judith Ma vs Abby Miller / Renee Pitra1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesClaire Todd vs Mary Cropp4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesFelicia Ng - (DQ)* / Sheila Loekito vs Rachel Martin / Sandra Cullen6-3, 6-4
2026-05-15vs ETC-Clinciu 2.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesJudith Ma / Sarah Gardner vs Jennifer Jensen / Irina Salvan7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesFelicia Ng - (DQ)* / Sheila Loekito vs Camelia Clinciu / Maria Smintina6-2, 6-0
2026-05-10vs TCSP-TibbettsWon 30
W#1 DoublesLily Ng / Susan Tamcsin vs Melissa Davis / Colleen Edwards6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesGenet Wubbie vs Linda Zuckerman6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesFelicia Ng - (DQ)* / Sheila Loekito vs Sandra Faucett / Rebecca Silverstein6-1, 6-1
2026-05-03vs WSC-Rally Cats-BanksWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Jordan / Sarah Gardner vs Dana Day / Jenjira Hellers6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGenet Wubbie vs Amanda Cendoya6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJudith Ma / Lily Ng vs Ashleigh Simons / Annie Thomson6-1, 6-1
2026-04-18vs RBW-Racquet Rascals-LauLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Jordan / Susan Tamcsin vs Debbie Shibata / Julie Natsis6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesSheila Loekito vs Mei Lau1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesClaire Todd / Genet Wubbie vs Sara Farag / Emily Wiersema4-6, 2-6
2026-04-12vs AYTC-Pookies-SeiWon 21
W#1 DoublesLily Ng / Felicia Ng - (DQ)* vs Roseanna Cen / Casey Babcock6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMary Jordan vs Suzanne Lance0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Gardner / Susan Tamcsin vs Jenny Gruenberg / Cindy Li6-3, 6-3
2026-04-03vs EDG-SolieWon 30
W#1 DoublesFelicia Ng - (DQ)* / Lily Ng vs Jingyuan Yin / Tingting Zheng7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMary Jordan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Gardner / Susan Tamcsin vs Bonnie Feher / Gesina Howard6-2, 6-1
W#1 DoublesLily Ng / Felicia Ng - (DQ)* vs Christina Catzoela / Lakshmi Rajesh6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJudith Ma vs Sabrina Albert6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMary Jordan / Claire Todd vs Xuechu Zhou / Rae Infante4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Felicia Ng
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 3
2.60
Lily Ng
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.41
Sarah Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.38
Susan Tamcsin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.37
Genet Wubbie
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Judith Ma
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.27
Sheila Loekito
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.22
Mary Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.03
Claire Todd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lily Ng + Felicia Ng7161% games+14.6% vs expected
Mary Jordan + Sheila Loekito3446% games−1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Felicia Ng
8W–8L career · type D · 13 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
2.5
Lily Ng
22W–24L career · 12 lines in 2026
0%24%76%
2.60
2.5
Sarah Gardner
18W–22L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
Susan Tamcsin
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%80%20%
2.38
Genet Wubbie
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Judith Ma
56W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Sheila Loekito
6W–15L career · type S · 9 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Mary Jordan
24W–33L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Claire Todd
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.