← Search

Julie Natsis

Bellevue, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
29 matches · 10W–19L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Julie Natsis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history29 matches
W
2026-09-13 · RTC-Toppano · #3 Doubles · 5.0 · with Pamela Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · ETC-Team2-Box · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Thomas Natsis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · ETC-Team2-Box · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Thomas Natsis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-5
L
Janey Petty / Scott Miller
2026-06-21 · ETC-Team2-Box · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Thomas Natsis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-24 · RBW-Racquet Rascals-Lau · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mei Lau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · RBW-Racquet Rascals-Lau · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Debbie Shibata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-10 · RBW-Racquet Rascals-Lau · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6
L
2026-04-26 · RBW-Racquet Rascals-Lau · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sara Farag
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-19 · RBW-Racquet Rascals-Lau · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Debbie Shibata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-18 · RBW-Racquet Rascals-Lau · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Debbie Shibata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-14 · RBW-Racket Rascals-Lau · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Debbie Shibata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-08 · RBW-Racket Rascals-Lau · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Debbie Shibata
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 44.2% of games
5.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 61.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
6 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal