Teams

ETC-Team2-Box

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 5.0

16 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-08vs FC-SouthsteckSmashers-ReifsteckLost 12
L#1 DoublesVenkat Mahalingam / Jennifer Grimes vs Bethany Brown / Upen Kattla3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMiroslav Spassov / Christina Ntouniaoglou vs Van Ly / Janice Sim2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesOveys Hedayati / Tammy Besel vs Celeste Green / Matt Papes6-3, 6-0
2026-08-01vs NWW-ETC-BoxLost 02
L#2 DoublesMiroslav Spassov / Lian Liu vs Angeline Newton / Jashan Parikh2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesArmin Alaghi / Ting Wang vs Sina Ghotbi / Diana Andrei5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-26vs MC-Mx 5.0-PurgananWon 21
L#1 DoublesLian Liu / Oveys Hedayati vs Dana Day / Forrest Yu7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTing Wang / Thomas Resing vs Marci Chew / Matthew Thomson6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristina Ntouniaoglou / Rush Velcsov vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-18vs MC-Mx 5.0-PurgananWon 20
W#2 DoublesOveys Hedayati / Ting Wang vs Maruthu Karuppaiah / Sheila Loekito6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesThomas Natsis / Julie Natsis vs Suresh Siricilla / Xiaoying Qiao7-6, 6-2
2026-07-12vs NWW-ETC-ShigakiLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarissa Fitzpatrick / Armin Alaghi vs Isi Owoo / Craig Montgomery6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Grimes / Miroslav Spassov vs Jeanie Richardson / Peter Igel6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChristina Ntouniaoglou / Rush Velcsov vs Jessica Barrett / Donald Gerard5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-07-05vs FC-SouthsteckSmashers-ReifsteckSplit 11
W#2 DoublesArmin Alaghi / Marissa Fitzpatrick vs Jeffrey McIlwain / Jessica Tjhin Southworth6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesThomas Resing / Lian Liu vs John Fong / Wei Zhan3-6, 2-6
2026-06-26vs NWW-ETC-BoxLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Grimes / Miroslav Spassov vs Juliet Friedl / Harry Arsene2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChristina Ntouniaoglou / Venkat Mahalingam vs Jennifer Eng / Alexander Nip1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Natsis / Thomas Natsis vs Lina Hsu / Craig Gant5-7, 4-5
2026-06-21vs NWW-ETC-ShigakiLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Grimes / Venkat Mahalingam vs Jeanie Richardson / David Harrell3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Natsis / Thomas Natsis vs Janey Petty / Scott Miller7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.24 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.41
Lian Liu
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.38
Jennifer Grimes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.37
Oveys Hedayati
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.35
Thomas Natsis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.34
Miroslav Spassov
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.33
Eugene Besel
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.31
Tammy Besel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.27
Rush Velcsov
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Marissa Fitzpatrick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.23
Armin Alaghi
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.19
Christina Ntouniaoglou
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.12
Julie Natsis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.11
Ting Wang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.06
Venkat Mahalingam
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.94
Thomas Resing
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Robert Box
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Besel + Eugene Besel41237% games−10.3% vs expected
Thomas Natsis + Julie Natsis3455% gamesnot enough data
Christina Ntouniaoglou + Rush Velcsov123 matchesnot enough data
Miroslav Spassov + Jennifer Grimes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Lian Liu
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.41
2.5
Jennifer Grimes
31W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
2.5
Oveys Hedayati
17W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Thomas Natsis
17W–14L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
2.5
Miroslav Spassov
24W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Eugene Besel
13W–39L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Tammy Besel
59W–75L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Rush Velcsov
34W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Marissa Fitzpatrick
15W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Armin Alaghi
4W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Christina Ntouniaoglou
34W–76L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Julie Natsis
9W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Ting Wang
5W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Venkat Mahalingam
3W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Thomas Resing
4W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Robert Box
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.