Teams

NWW-ETC-Box

2026 Mixed 40 & Over · 5.0

17 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-02Won 20
W#2 DoublesCraig Gant / Christina Catzoela vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSina Ghotbi / Angeline Newton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-08-01vs ETC-Team2-BoxWon 30
W#1 DoublesLina Hsu / Mehrdad Mozafari vs Tammy Besel / Eugene Besel6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAngeline Newton / Jashan Parikh vs Miroslav Spassov / Lian Liu6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesSina Ghotbi / Diana Andrei vs Armin Alaghi / Ting Wang7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-26vs NWW-ETC-ShigakiWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer Eng / Sina Ghotbi vs Jessica Barrett / Kevin Ceder6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCaiping Zang / Alexander Nip vs Jeanie Richardson / Saba Kalaimani6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLina Hsu / Mehrdad Mozafari vs Whitney Bull / Becca Bull6-3, 6-0
2026-07-18vs NWW-ETC-ShigakiLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Eng / Alexander Nip vs Christine Shigaki / David Harrell6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDiana Andrei / Jashan Parikh vs Isi Owoo / Craig Montgomery5-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristina Catzoela / Craig Gant vs Janey Petty / Scott Miller2-6, 3-6
2026-07-12vs MC-Mx 5.0-PurgananWon 30
W#1 DoublesLina Hsu / Adrian Hamza vs Aditya Choudhary / Dana Day6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJuliet Friedl / Sina Ghotbi vs Adrian Cendoya / Xiaoying Qiao6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCraig Gant / Christina Catzoela vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-28vs FC-SouthsteckSmashers-ReifsteckWon 10
W#2 DoublesChristina Catzoela / Jashan Parikh vs John Fong / Wei Zhan6-1, 6-3
2026-06-26vs ETC-Team2-BoxWon 30
W#1 DoublesJuliet Friedl / Harry Arsene vs Jennifer Grimes / Miroslav Spassov6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Eng / Alexander Nip vs Christina Ntouniaoglou / Venkat Mahalingam6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLina Hsu / Craig Gant vs Julie Natsis / Thomas Natsis7-5, 5-4
2026-06-13vs FC-SouthsteckSmashers-ReifsteckWon 20
W#2 DoublesCaiping Zang / Alexander Nip vs Todd Reifsteck / Janice Sim6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAngeline Newton / Adrian Hamza vs Celeste Green / John Fong6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Jennifer Eng
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.68
Jashan Parikh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.57
Harry Arsene
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.57
Lina Hsu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.53
Alicia Arsene
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.52
Caiping Zang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.45
Alexander Nip
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.42
Mehrdad Mozafari
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.41
Adrian Hamza
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.40
Juliet Friedl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.36
Craig Gant
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.31
Diana Andrei
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.28
Sina Ghotbi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.20
Omid Fatemieh
published
2.16
Angeline Newton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.15
Christina Catzoela
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Robert Box
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harry Arsene + Alicia Arsene404 matchesnot enough data
Craig Gant + Christina Catzoela213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Jennifer Eng
39W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.79
2.5
Jashan Parikh
15W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.68
2.5
Harry Arsene
17W–4L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.57
2.5
Lina Hsu
34W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%31%69%
2.57
2.5
Alicia Arsene
29W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%42%58%
2.53
2.5
Caiping Zang
41W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%44%56%
2.52
2.5
Alexander Nip
10W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.45
2.5
Mehrdad Mozafari
29W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.42
2.5
Adrian Hamza
3W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Juliet Friedl
33W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%78%22%
2.40
2.5
Craig Gant
12W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.36
2.5
Diana Andrei
5W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Sina Ghotbi
4W–0L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.28
Omid Fatemieh
4W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Angeline Newton
6W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
2.5
Christina Catzoela
16W–22L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Robert Box
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.