Search

Deborah Rappaport

Seattle, WA
2.5C year-end 2025
81 matches · 35W–46L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.02.53.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.47
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.0
66%
stay 2.5
34%
up to 3.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 91% stay · 9% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.39. Lower than today’s 2.47 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 2.5 runs from 2.01 to 2.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 2.5
9 of 17
WA · 2.5
49 of 81

Deborah is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Deborah has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.02.53.02019202020212023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 2.5, Deborah has gone from the 86th to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
66.7%
20W–10L · 54.8% of games
3.0
26.7%
8W–22L · 39% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
7W–14L · 39.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history81 matches
L
Helen Chatalas / Laurie Bauder
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Colleen Edwards
+0.015about as expected — took 43% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Janice Sim / Jessica Tjhin Southworth
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Michelle Warren
0.015about as expected — took 68% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Asha DSouza / Raj Rajasekarmixed
2026-07-03 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Adam Tratt
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 27% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Laura Borner / Amol Hanwantemixed
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Young Lee
+0.000about as expected — took 40% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W
Meredith Kelly / Andrea Tapia
2026-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Colleen Edwards
0.027below expectation — took 50% of games against 62% expected
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Celine Impert / Jane Vail
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Colleen Edwards
+0.017better than expected — took 46% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
Akiko Koyama / Mark Chenmixed
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Adam Tratt
+0.000better than expected — took 20% of games against 4% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Catherine Whissell / Lisa Williamson
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Colleen Edwards
0.050below expectation — took 8% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Valeriia Zaychenko / Flavia Storelli
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Xinbei Gong
0.001below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Julie Natsis / Mei Lau
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Colleen Edwards
0.015below expectation — took 50% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
Zeran Wang / Chunchun Tong
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennie Shaw
0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Catherine Pidgeon / Lisa Collins
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Colleen Edwards
+0.036better than expected — took 56% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.