Teams

TCSP-Tibbetts

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2026-05-31vs ETC-Clinciu 2.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesColleen Edwards / Linda Zuckerman vs Jennifer Jensen / Isadora Helena Pereira Costa7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Murphy / Melissa Davis vs Elena Fanaru / Agnita Pandian4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-24vs RBW-Racquet Rascals-LauWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeborah Rappaport / Colleen Edwards vs Julie Natsis / Mei Lau7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Silverstein / Anna Davidson vs Sara Farag / Vera Makianich6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-24vs RTC-ToppanoWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Tibbetts / Letitia Selk vs Carrie Toppano / Lynne Pogue6-2, 7-6
W#1 DoublesColleen Edwards / Deborah Rappaport vs Catherine Pidgeon / Lisa Collins2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLinda Zuckerman vs Flora Zhang2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Davis / Anna Davidson vs Lakshmi Rajesh / Rae Infante3-6, 2-6
2026-05-10vs BETC-JordanLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelissa Davis / Colleen Edwards vs Lily Ng / Susan Tamcsin2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLinda Zuckerman vs Genet Wubbie2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Faucett / Rebecca Silverstein vs Felicia Ng - (DQ)* / Sheila Loekito1-6, 1-6
2026-05-10vs BC-PoortWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Tibbetts / Helen Chatalas vs Jayme Hattrup / Sibylle Brown6-3, 6-1
2026-05-08vs ETC-Team1 2.5W-BoxWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Tibbetts / Letitia Selk vs Zhijiao Liu / Yunting Li6-4, 7-6
2026-04-25vs AYTC-Pookies-SeiLost 03
L#1 DoublesColleen Edwards / Sarah Murphy vs Flora Taagen / Jenny Gruenberg2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKristine Dangla vs Suzanne Lance0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Faucett / Anna Davidson vs Mila Burdan / Liz Speigel5-7, 3-6
2026-04-10vs EDG-SolieLost 12
W#1 DoublesDeborah Rappaport / Linda Zuckerman vs Karen Walter / Bonnie Feher4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKristine Dangla vs Sharon Solie1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSandra Faucett / Rebecca Silverstein vs Nicole Lew / Gesina Howard2-6, 1-6
2026-04-04vs WSC-Rally Cats-BanksLost 12
L#1 DoublesColleen Edwards / Jennifer Coursen vs Dana Day / Alexa Easterday5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSandra Faucett vs Michelle Dea6-7, 3-4
W#2 DoublesLinda Zuckerman / Deborah Rappaport vs Katie Banks / Stacy Harrison6-3, 6-4
2026-04-03vs MC-W 2.5-KrackeWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlexandra Tibbetts / Mardella Brekke-Hutchings vs Kendall Kracke / Gabrielle Taylor7-5, 6-2
2026-03-29vs FC-Respect Your Elders-PitraWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Zuckerman / Deborah Rappaport vs Clara Hsu / Mary Cropp6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRebecca Silverstein vs Adriana Lopes1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Faucett / Jennifer Coursen vs Abby Miller / Stacey Carmona6-4, 4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.36
Alexandra Tibbetts
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 2.5
2.29
Deborah Rappaport
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.25
Jennifer Coursen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.20
Linda Zuckerman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.06
Colleen Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.02
Melissa Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.02
Anna Davidson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.99
Rebecca Silverstein
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
1.86
Sandra Faucett
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Kristine Dangla
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Rappaport + Colleen Edwards3344% games+5.6% vs expected
Deborah Rappaport + Linda Zuckerman303 matchesnot enough data
Colleen Edwards + Melissa Davis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Alexandra Tibbetts
18W–6L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.36
2.5
Deborah Rappaport
35W–46L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
Jennifer Coursen
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
Linda Zuckerman
12W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Colleen Edwards
5W–13L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Melissa Davis
32W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Anna Davidson
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Rebecca Silverstein
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
2.5
Sandra Faucett
1W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Kristine Dangla
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.