← Search

Jane Vail

Seattle, WA
2.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
60 matches · 23W–37L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jane Vail to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
L
2026-07-24 · String Theory · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Celine Impert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · String Theory · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Celine Impert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · HBSQ-Reda/Tandon · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Travis Vail mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · String Theory · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Celine Impert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-07 · String Theory · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Celine Impert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-30 · String Theory · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Celine Impert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-21 · HBSQ-Reda/Tandon · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Travis Vail mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-21 · String Theory · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Celine Impert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-22 · TCSP-TopSpain · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lane Youngblood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-09 · TCSP-TopSpain · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Monica Spain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-08 · TCSP-Serving Fine Lines-Spain · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Williamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-17 · TCSP-TopSpain · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
45.9%
17W–20L · 48.9% of games
3.0
0%
0W–5L · 31.1% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
18 matches
#1 Singles
7%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal