Teams

TCSP-Serving Fine Lines-Spain

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-07vs MI-NowakowskiLost 04
L#1 DoublesBridget Perry / Sara Javid vs Krista Nowakowski / Julia Bai3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAnne Manicone vs Rae Wang3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesErikka Arone / Suzanne Kalberer vs Suzanne Vannatter / Kathryn Bauman1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Sowder / Jane Vail vs Mina Laban / Stacey Roehrs1-6, 4-6
2026-02-28vs RTC-SimmondsLost 04
L#1 DoublesLisa Adamek / Stephanie Tetrick vs Haley Neff-LaFord / Robin Aronson6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSara Javid vs Akiko Koyama2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Spain / Lisa Williamson vs Sandra Stapleton / Debra Simmonds5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLisa Sowder / Suzanne Kalberer vs Karen Hayward / Tammy Besel2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-22vs NWW-BETC-IkedaLost 04
L#1 DoublesBeth Schryer / Lisa Williamson vs Pamela Menchaca / Jill Wakefield3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBlaire Burman vs Jade Phan2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesRochelle Legg / Lisa Sowder vs Lynne Nowicki / Kathy Wang1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Kalberer / Michiko Kono vs Rebecca Mann / Julie Ikeda1-6, 3-6
2026-02-06vs BC-BlochLost 04
L#1 DoublesLisa Adamek / Jane Vail vs Brooke Krekel / Michelle Chattin3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Tetrick vs Melanie Gerard3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRochelle Legg / Michiko Kono vs Andreanna Kapogiannatos / Kathryn Wenger1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Spain / Anne Manicone vs Christine Bloch / Emily Negley4-6, 2-6
2026-02-01vs AYTC-TrumbauerLost 04
L#1 DoublesLisa Adamek / Sara Javid vs Elizabeth Parker / Veronica Golden1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Tetrick vs Stephanie Randle1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Manicone / Blaire Burman vs Claudia Martinucci / Marci Wright6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Vail / Monica Spain vs Barbara Selemon / Lori Estes4-6, 3-6
2026-01-23vs RBW-BozickLost 04
L#1 DoublesBridget Perry / Rochelle Legg vs Kristine Kleinsmith / Sherry Kebeck1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Tetrick vs Holly Hovey4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMichiko Kono / Suzanne Kalberer vs Pam Rasanen / Takako Chavez2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Williamson / Monica Spain vs Jo Gartenberg / Maren Gibson4-6, 3-6
2026-01-18vs BTA-Longhorns-EndoLost 13
W#1 DoublesLisa Adamek / Stephanie Tetrick vs Xiaobei Li / Asako Endo6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesErikka Arone vs Hui Xu5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Manicone / Michiko Kono vs Xiaohe Hao / Li Wang6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBlaire Burman / Monica Spain vs Jiandan Zheng / Yunda Huang4-6, 4-6
2026-01-09vs WSC-Golden Roast and RallyLost 04
L#1 DoublesLisa Adamek / Michiko Kono vs Elise Zabel / Meghan Bradner0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Tetrick vs Brenna Loury3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBridget Perry / Lisa Williamson vs Christie Cabrera / Julia Roast1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRochelle Legg / Beth Schryer vs Jenjira Hellers / Stuart Childress6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Blaire Burman
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Lisa Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.57
Lisa Adamek
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Stephanie Tetrick
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Bridget Perry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.44
Rochelle Legg
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.38
Erikka Arone
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.29
Lisa Sowder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.28
Jane Vail
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.27
Sara Javid
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.27
Suzanne Kalberer
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.26
Anne Manicone
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.25
Michiko Kono
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.24
Beth Schryer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.12
Monica Spain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
Marites Mendoza
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica Spain + Lisa Williamson10855% games+3.5% vs expected
Sara Javid + Anne Manicone4351% games+2.8% vs expected
Lisa Adamek + Michiko Kono6551% games+2.2% vs expected
Monica Spain + Lisa Sowder3248% games−1.8% vs expected
Suzanne Kalberer + Lisa Williamson3547% games−2.5% vs expected
Suzanne Kalberer + Anne Manicone2343% games−15.6% vs expected
Suzanne Kalberer + Lisa Sowder3350% gamesnot enough data
Monica Spain + Jane Vail134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Blaire Burman
0W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
2.5
Lisa Williamson
48W–66L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%21%79%
2.61
3
Lisa Adamek
16W–40L career · 5 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Stephanie Tetrick
32W–58L career · 6 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.49
3
Bridget Perry
0W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Rochelle Legg
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
Erikka Arone
10W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.38
Lisa Sowder
16W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Jane Vail
23W–37L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
Sara Javid
26W–35L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Suzanne Kalberer
19W–30L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Anne Manicone
18W–26L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
2.5
Michiko Kono
25W–42L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
3
Beth Schryer
28W–49L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.24
2.5
Monica Spain
35W–69L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Marites Mendoza
6W–21L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.