Teams

TCSP-Davis

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

16 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-07vs NWW-AYTC-TibbettsLost 03
L#1 DoublesErika Olson / Alisha Horey vs Helen Chatalas / Michelle Warren1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLinda Zuckerman vs Letitia Selk7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Danoff / Jennifer Coursen vs Catherine Whissell / Jennifer Longtin2-6, 0-6
2026-03-01vs ETC-Box 2.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesDawn Klinghoffer / Deborah Rappaport vs Karen Ng / Caiping Zang4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Davis / Colleen Edwards vs Jen Greenberg / Jennifer Grimes6-7, 1-6
2026-02-22vs TCSP-SpainLost 02
L#1 DoublesColleen Edwards / Jennifer Coursen vs Lisa Williamson / Lisa Sowder3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Tapia / Susan Bussell vs Celine Impert / Jia Tang0-6, 4-6
2026-02-14vs CAC/SL-Bet on our courtWon 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Davis / Deborah Rappaport vs Vandella Stewart / Tatyana Gordon3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMeredith Kelly vs Celeste Green6-1, 6-0
2026-01-24vs EDG-SolieSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrea Tapia / Amelia Brandt vs Tingting Zheng / Karen Walter0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Bussell / Erika Olson vs Sharon Solie / Chanthina Julian2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-01-17vs MC-2.5W-MorenoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDeborah Rappaport / Susan Bussell vs Mary Jordan / Sheila Loekito0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMelissa Davis / Colleen Edwards vs Marci Chew / Tammy Morley6-2, 6-2
2026-01-11vs FC-MartinWon 20
W#1 DoublesDawn Klinghoffer / Erika Olson vs Mary Cropp / Sandra Cullen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlisha Horey / Hillary Peterman vs Jayme Horn / Renee Pitra4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-01-02vs TCSP-SpainLost 02
L#1 DoublesMolly Meltsner / Hillary Peterman vs Jia Tang / Jane Vail4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Danoff / Meredith Kelly vs Barbara Trentalange / Deirdre Gately5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.42
Molly Meltsner
published
2.32
Dawn Klinghoffer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.31
Amelia Brandt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.28
Deborah Rappaport
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Alisha Horey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Dara Lockert
published 2.5
2.25
Jennifer Coursen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Linda Zuckerman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.16
Susan Bussell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.10
Hillary Peterman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.05
Colleen Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.04
Meredith Kelly
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.02
Melissa Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.02
Andrea Tapia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Erika Olson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Danoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Bussell + Hillary Peterman3350% games+0.8% vs expected
Deborah Rappaport + Colleen Edwards3344% games+0.2% vs expected
Hillary Peterman + Dawn Klinghoffer3741% games−8.9% vs expected
Hillary Peterman + Melissa Davis3642% gamesnot enough data
Susan Bussell + Dara Lockert4157% gamesnot enough data
Susan Bussell + Nancy Danoff134 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Danoff + Dara Lockert134 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Klinghoffer + Melissa Davis134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Meltsner
7W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
2.5
Dawn Klinghoffer
44W–41L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Amelia Brandt
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
2.5
Deborah Rappaport
35W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Alisha Horey
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Dara Lockert
9W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Coursen
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Linda Zuckerman
12W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
2.5
Susan Bussell
21W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Hillary Peterman
30W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Colleen Edwards
5W–13L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Meredith Kelly
8W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Melissa Davis
32W–55L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Andrea Tapia
3W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Erika Olson
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Danoff
10W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.