Teams

RBW-Racquet Rascals-Lau

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-24vs TCSP-TibbettsLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Natsis / Mei Lau vs Deborah Rappaport / Colleen Edwards7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRosa Franklin vs Sarah Murphy6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSara Farag / Vera Makianich vs Rebecca Silverstein / Anna Davidson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-15vs EDG-SolieWon 21
L#1 DoublesJulie Natsis / Debbie Shibata vs Karen Walter / Nicole Lew2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEmily Wiersema vs Rui Huang6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMei Lau / Rosa Franklin vs Stephanie Dickman / Jingyuan Yin6-1, 6-2
2026-05-10vs AYTC-Pookies-SeiWon 21
W#1 DoublesRosa Franklin / D Shibata vs Jennifer Sei / Roseanna Cen6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJulie Natsis vs Cindy Li6-4, 5-6
L#2 DoublesSara Farag / Vera Makianich vs Momo Rutkin / Casey Babcock6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-05-03vs ETC-Clinciu 2.5WWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Farag / Rosa Franklin vs Irina Salvan / Roxana Rautu7-5, 5-5
W#1 SinglesEmily Wiersema vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMei Lau / Debbie Shibata vs Jennifer Jensen / Camelia Clinciu6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesEmily Wiersema / Mei Lau vs Lisa Collins / Sara Mcmorrow3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesVera Makianich vs Xuechu Zhou1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSara Farag / Julie Natsis vs Christina Catzoela / Sabrina Albert4-6, 4-6
2026-04-19vs FC-Respect Your Elders-PitraLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Natsis / Debbie Shibata vs Meredith Kelly / Liz Sheffield5-7, 5-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMei Lau vs Stacey Carmona6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSara Farag / Vera Makianich vs Sandra Cullen / Mary Cropp2-6, 3-6
2026-04-18vs BETC-JordanWon 21
L#1 DoublesDebbie Shibata / Julie Natsis vs Mary Jordan / Susan Tamcsin1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMei Lau vs Sheila Loekito6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSara Farag / Emily Wiersema vs Claire Todd / Genet Wubbie6-4, 6-2
2026-03-28vs WSC-Rally Cats-BanksLost 12
L#1 DoublesVera Makianich / Emily Wiersema vs Katie Banks / Jenjira Hellers6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesSara Farag vs Michelle Dea7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMei Lau / Rosa Franklin vs Stacy Harrison / Pamela Nelson6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.56
Rosa Franklin
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.48
Mei Lau
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
2.37
Emily Wiersema
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
Debbie Shibata
published 2.5
2.12
Julie Natsis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.00
Sara Farag
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
1.97
Vera Makianich
usually #2 Singles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Farag + Vera Makianich044 matchesnot enough data
Sara Farag + Julie Natsis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rosa Franklin
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%32%68%
2.56
2.5
Mei Lau
29W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
2.5
Emily Wiersema
18W–23L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.37
2.5
Debbie Shibata
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Julie Natsis
9W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Sara Farag
7W–35L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Vera Makianich
6W–53L career · 9 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.