Teams

BETC-Ruth

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-28vs PSC-High Five-QinWon 30
W#1 DoublesKyung Mi Lee / In Young Jung vs Mihaela Frintu / Raluca Hera6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesVicky Dinh / My-Hong Truong vs Nicoleta Cristache / Li Qin6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLily Ng / Yan Mathison vs Geanina Andreiu / Jennifer Jensen6-0, 6-2
2026-02-22vs NTC-KennedySplit 22
W#1 DoublesIn Young Jung / Kyung Mi Lee vs Khue Tran / Suanty Kaghan6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMy-Hong Truong vs Margaret Stuart6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJuliet Wu / MaryAnn O'Connell vs Erin Kennedy / Seow-Ling Chua3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSun-Mi Ruth / Yan Mathison vs Junghee Kim / Susan Bonner6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-14vs RTC-See You In Court-CatzoelaWon 40
W#1 DoublesLily Ng / Sun-Mi Ruth vs Pallavi Taleppadi / Caiping Zang6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesKey Nuqui vs Christina Catzoela6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMary Jordan / Carol Markham vs Christina Ntouniaoglou / Cecilia Verastegui6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJuliet Wu / MaryAnn O'Connell vs Elizabeth Amick / Lisa Collins6-2, 6-3
2026-02-08vs TCSP-Sharks-TarteLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Markham / Sun-Mi Ruth vs Lisa Hagan / Sheila Connolly6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesYan Mathison / Vicky Dinh vs Robin Tarte / Christine Alley Krabak2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJuliet Wu / MaryAnn O'Connell vs Kimberly Miller / Liesl Langley4-6, 2-6
2026-01-24vs RBW-Group Therapy-EnglishLost 13
L#1 DoublesSun-Mi Ruth / Sylvian Colley vs Laurie Wilkins / Michele Lalime1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesYan Mathison vs Ozzy English0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKyung Mi Lee / In Young Jung vs Julia Boneva / Kimberly Wong4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVicky Dinh / Lily Ng vs Amy Sung / Anne Richardson-Lander6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesIn Young Jung / Kyung Mi Lee vs Reese Cowan Stewart / Sarah Nicholson3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKey Nuqui vs Alana Holmquist2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMy-Hong Truong / Yan Mathison vs Erin Corson / Brittany Caldwell2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSylvian Colley / Sun-Mi Ruth vs Juliet Friedl / Rives Kitchell5-7, 3-6
2026-01-09vs MI-Simply Smashing-NielsenWon 31
W#1 DoublesVicky Dinh / My-Hong Truong vs Selamawit Engda / Catherine Nielsen6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKey Nuqui vs Emily Norden3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesYan Mathison / Sylvian Colley vs Connie Manson / Mindy Rowe2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMary Jordan / Carol Markham vs Maria McBride / Huyen Hoang6-2, 6-1
2026-01-04vs CP-Victorious-BeckerLost 04
L#1 DoublesLily Ng / Sun-Mi Ruth vs Colleen Grobstok / Mary Jean Waite3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesKey Nuqui vs Nely Koralska1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Markham / Mary Jordan vs Chandler Wadsworth / Michelle Dauphiny Becker3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJuliet Wu / MaryAnn O'Connell vs Linda Greenlaw / Katie van Zyl4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Vicky Dinh
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
My-Hong Truong
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
MaryAnn O'Connell
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
In Young Jung
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Kyung Mi Lee
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Key Nuqui
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.63
Carol Markham
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.60
Lily Ng
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.53
Sun-Mi Ruth
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.46
Sylvian Colley
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.44
Juliet Wu
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.36
Yan Mathison
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.22
Mary Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

My-Hong Truong + Vicky Dinh4168% games+10.9% vs expected
Kyung Mi Lee + In Young Jung101150% games+5.0% vs expected
In Young Jung + Sun-Mi Ruth3357% games+4.2% vs expected
Juliet Wu + MaryAnn O'Connell152348% games−2.7% vs expected
Carol Markham + Mary Jordan3547% games−2.8% vs expected
Juliet Wu + In Young Jung2642% games−4.2% vs expected
Juliet Wu + Sun-Mi Ruth213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Vicky Dinh
19W–20L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
3
My-Hong Truong
66W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.81
3
MaryAnn O'Connell
31W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
In Young Jung
25W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Kyung Mi Lee
31W–59L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
Key Nuqui
6W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Carol Markham
39W–67L career · 10 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
2.5
Lily Ng
22W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%24%76%
2.60
3
Sun-Mi Ruth
27W–86L career · 6 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Sylvian Colley
43W–53L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46
3
Juliet Wu
33W–56L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.44
3
Yan Mathison
3W–11L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.36
2.5
Mary Jordan
24W–33L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.