Search

Lee Darrow

Mill Creek, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
200 matches · 97W–103L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.95
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
72%
stay 3.0
28%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 93% stay · 7% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.88. Lower than today’s 2.95 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mill Creek · 3.0
2 of 5
WA · 3.0
331 of 755

Lee is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lee has been a steady 3.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Lee has gone from the 84th to the 20th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 55.5% of games
3.0
50%
37W–37L · 50.2% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.1% of games
6.0
53.1%
26W–23L · 50.5% of games
7.0
29.2%
7W–17L · 43.6% of games
6.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 47.8% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history200 matches
L
Reese Cowan Stewart / Brittany Caldwellchamps
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Milly Lee
0.074below expectation — took 0% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Lee
+0.026better than expected — took 58% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
Jiandan Zheng / Xiaobei Li
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Milly Lee
0.001about as expected — took 62% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Telsin Brower / Dorothy Darrow
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Lee
+0.082better than expected — took 80% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Jing Peng / Ailiu Wu
2026-05-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tatyana Gordon
0.040below expectation — took 38% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-05-20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Lee
+0.006about as expected — took 43% of games against 41% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Barbara Smith / Martha Evatt
2026-05-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michiyo Killeen
+0.087better than expected — took 80% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-07 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Lee
0.002about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Lee
+0.056better than expected — took 53% of games against 34% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelly Finn
0.060below expectation — took 37% of games against 62% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane O'Brien
+0.004about as expected — took 40% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Aleana Harris / Ann Wilson
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Milly Lee
+0.042better than expected — took 59% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.