← Search

Lee Darrow

Mill Creek, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
200 matches · 97W–103L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lee Darrow to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history200 matches
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Milly Lee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-08 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-06 · CAC/SL-Calling the Shots-Brandt · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Milly Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-05 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-24 · CAC/SL-Calling the Shots-Brandt · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tatyana Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · CAC/SL-Hofmann · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michiyo Killeen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-05-07 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · CAC/SL-Calling the Shots-Brandt · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-28 · CAC/SL-Hofmann · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shelly Finn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-23 · HBSQ-Yeigh · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane O'Brien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-17 · CAC/SL-Calling the Shots-Brandt · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Milly Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 55.5% of games
3.0
50%
37W–37L · 50.2% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.1% of games
6.0
53.1%
26W–23L · 50.5% of games
7.0
29.2%
7W–17L · 43.6% of games
6.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 47.8% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
54 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal