← Search

Ruthann Nelson

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
180 matches · 112W–68L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.00
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
50%
stay 3.0
50%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 85% stay · 15% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.92. Lower than today’s 3.00 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
56 of 144
WA · 3.0
249 of 755

Ruthann is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ruthann has been a steady 3.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Ruthann has gone from the 76th to the 54th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
51.5%
17W–16L · 51.5% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
70.2%
59W–25L · 57.4% of games
7.0
45%
9W–11L · 50.3% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history180 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Izumi Sullivan
+0.008about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Nancy Bettesworth / Marie Lambertchamps
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Izumi Sullivan
+0.031better than expected — took 71% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Izumi Sullivan
−0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
Susan Louie / Anne Bratton
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Dubuque
+0.014better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Lori Nelson / Ann Rae Smith
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Blegen
−0.029below expectation — took 32% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Izumi Sullivan
−0.008about as expected — took 57% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Wakefield
+0.014below expectation — took 14% of games against 21% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Izumi Sullivan
+0.037better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Lee Darrow / Jane O'Brien
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Blegen
−0.004about as expected — took 60% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Connie Elim / Christina Vanburenchamps
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · with Ming Vuong
+0.011about as expected — took 35% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Chandra Pandey / Sasha Moinzadehchamps
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · with Happy Grove
+0.020better than expected — took 52% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
Dolly Ivanov / Tammy Chuchamps
2026-03-22 · #2 Doubles · with Rebecca Mann
−0.078below expectation — took 14% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.