Search

Lori Nelson

Everett, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
143 matches · 80W–63L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.13
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
5%
stay 3.0
95%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 42% stay · 58% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.02. Lower than today’s 3.13 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Everett · 3.0
1 of 9
WA · 3.0
67 of 755

Lori is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lori has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 7 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.52019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Lori has gone from the 46th to the 33rd percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
57.1%
16W–12L · 53.5% of games
3.5
18.2%
4W–18L · 39.4% of games
6.0
79.4%
27W–7L · 61.8% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
55%
11W–9L · 53.6% of games
7.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 45.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Debbie Schrock
0.004better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Aiko Tamiya / Donald Shifrinmixed
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mario Hernandez
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Susan Bussell / Frances Costigan
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Debra Egge
+0.002better than expected — took 80% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-08 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ellen Ramsey
+0.028better than expected — took 75% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jenny Pinkerton
0.014about as expected — took 56% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
Ann Lampman / Betsy Chamberlin
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carrie Wies
+0.009better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Rae Smith
+0.032better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Meg Viera / Rebecca Zimmer
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill LaRosa
+0.035better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Rae Smith
+0.029better than expected — took 68% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Felicia Ng / Lily Ng
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Schrock
0.073below expectation — took 25% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Rae Smith
+0.011better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Mary Mcevoy / Michell Marx
2026-04-28 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ann Rae Smith
+0.069better than expected — took 92% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.