← Search

Maren Gibson

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
255 matches · 125W–130L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Maren Gibson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history255 matches
L
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Nellie Bozick championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-31 · WSC-Abraldes · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lia Morrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-21 · Gibson/Rasanen/Bozick · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nellie Bozick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-10 · WSC-Abraldes · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Ann Rae Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-02 · Gibson/Rasanen/Bozick · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Rasanen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · WSC-Abraldes · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lia Morrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · Gibson/Rasanen/Bozick · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nellie Bozick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · Gibson/Rasanen/Bozick · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Rasanen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · RBW-Howe Nice · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Roseshel Howe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-22 · RBW-Golden Girls-Dodd · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Rasanen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-06 · RBW-Howe Nice · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Rasanen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-01 · RBW-Rasanen · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
60%
6W–4L · 50.6% of games
3.0
58%
58W–42L · 51.9% of games
3.5
30.8%
8W–18L · 43.3% of games
6.0
46.2%
30W–35L · 50.1% of games
7.0
44.2%
19W–24L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
109 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
71 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova