← Search

Bonnie Currey

Bellevue, WA
3.0A year-end 2025
160 matches · 30W–130L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.49
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
53%
down to 2.5
47%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 32% down · 68% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.54. Higher than today’s 2.49 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
63 of 63
WA · 3.0
752 of 755

Bonnie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Bonnie has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Bonnie has gone from the 9th to the 0th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
15.8%
3W–16L · 37.6% of games
3.0
16.1%
10W–52L · 34.3% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
24.6%
15W–46L · 40.5% of games
7.0
15.4%
2W–11L · 33% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 26.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history160 matches
L
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Diane Kuenster
+0.038better than expected — took 29% of games against 23% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Christine Bloch
−0.019below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Esther Gladson
+0.020better than expected — took 40% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Jackie Fuller / Kendall Kracke
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Goe
−0.015below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Kristi Edwards / KAYOKO SHIBUE
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Bratton
−0.032below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Kuenster
−0.011below expectation — took 14% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Michell Marx / Diane Erickson
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Kuenster
+0.012about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Barbara Selemon / Kimberly Baisch
2026-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Diane Kuenster
+0.026better than expected — took 52% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Betsy Chamberlin
−0.016below expectation — took 32% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-0
L
Kaitlynn Hall / Michelle Fine
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alison Shea
−0.005below expectation — took 32% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
Janine Francisco / Rebecca Yuen
2026-04-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joia Poort
−0.022below expectation — took 8% of games against 30% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Christie Vandyke / Kristen Beck
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Indu Tursa
−0.019below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.