← Search

Lesley Burvill Holmes

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
149 matches · 69W–80L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.77
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
125 of 144
WA · 3.0
614 of 755

Lesley is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lesley has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Lesley has gone from the 67th to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
32.4%
12W–25L · 45.1% of games
3.5
25%
3W–9L · 43.5% of games
6.0
57.1%
24W–18L · 53.1% of games
7.0
63.2%
24W–14L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history149 matches
L
2026-06-03 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Keegan
−0.041below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Janet Bell / Karen Felton
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Keegan
+0.093better than expected — took 92% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Bonnie Currey / Betsy Chamberlin
2026-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Valerie Gilbert
+0.016better than expected — took 68% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
Cristi Rivas / Rebecca DeGeorge
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Stuart
+0.035better than expected — took 55% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 5-5
L
Carrie Morris / Karen Dixon
2026-02-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Stuart
−0.006about as expected — took 37% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Fay Sakamoto / Wendy Kimichamps
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · with Ann Bowden
−0.034below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Janet Phelps / Nancy Swickchamps
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · with Rosemary Curran
−0.017below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Kathleen McSweeney / Mary Soliozychamps
2026-01-23 · #2 Doubles · with Sue Matyas
−0.047below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-10-18 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Matyas
−0.010about as expected — took 41% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 4-4
L
Erin Kennedy / Leona Zamora
2025-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Susan Bonner
+0.001about as expected — took 42% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Matyas
+0.076better than expected — took 86% of games against 46% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Barbara Maughan / Lynda Borjachamps
2025-09-13 · #2 Doubles · with Susan Cross
+0.021better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.