Search

Cynthia Shimizu

Issaquah, WA
3.0A year-end 2025
84 matches · 35W–49L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.02
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
42%
stay 3.0
58%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 81% stay · 19% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.93. Lower than today’s 3.02 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Issaquah · 3.0
5 of 13
WA · 3.0
221 of 755

Cynthia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cynthia has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Cynthia has gone from the 4th to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 63.3% of games
3.5
36.7%
11W–19L · 44.3% of games
6.0
100%
4W–0L · 74.2% of games
7.0
33.3%
14W–28L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history84 matches
W
Ann Lampman / Maria Quinn
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Linda Mate
0.012below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heidi Broecking
0.011below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Vrana
0.014below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
Nancy Roma / Dona Golden
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Martin
+0.025better than expected — took 53% of games against 41% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolyn Martin
0.027below expectation — took 37% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kay Almer
+0.004about as expected — took 46% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
Kelly Ambrose / Edith Matulka
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Carmen Pong
0.080below expectation — took 14% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Lisa Baisler / Carol Tan
2026-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Higgins
+0.016better than expected — took 71% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Rachael Alnwick / Karen Rice
2026-01-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gina Jones
+0.022better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Elizabeth Martin / Cristina Mejia
2025-11-02 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lainie Dickson
+0.046better than expected — took 75% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Julie Sedlacek / Donna Platou
2025-11-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Aki Emori
+0.013better than expected — took 56% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mitra Shams
+0.025better than expected — took 65% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.