Search

Gina Jones

Snoqualmie, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
106 matches · 61W–45L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.02
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
38%
stay 3.0
62%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 79% stay · 21% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.94. Lower than today’s 3.02 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
206 of 755

Gina is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Gina has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Gina has gone from the 45th to the 50th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
59.7%
37W–25L · 52.7% of games
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.3% of games
6.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 61% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history106 matches
W
Rachael Claridge / Rebecca Huang
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mitra Shams
+0.038better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Xinlu Tu / Elaine Wang
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nelly Ketefian
0.067below expectation — took 29% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Jessica Hamilton / Blaire Burman
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sophie Fawcett
0.059below expectation — took 37% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Tara Roberts / Barty Nicholson
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jing Long
+0.023better than expected — took 86% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Connie Elim / Christina Vanburenchamps
2026-03-20 · #1 Doubles · with Sophie Fawcett
+0.043better than expected — took 53% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Rina Adams / Valerie Gilbert
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sophie Fawcett
+0.000about as expected — took 55% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
Liza Minasyan / Anahit Sukhudyan
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mitra Shams
0.026below expectation — took 25% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Connie Elim / Christina Vanburen
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sophie Fawcett
0.009below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Leslie Vigil / KAYOKO SHIBUE
2026-01-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mitra Shams
+0.029better than expected — took 63% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Rachael Alnwick / Karen Rice
2026-01-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cynthia Shimizu
+0.022better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Peggy Cockrell / Vandella Stewart
2025-10-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Shimizu
+0.022better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-10-03 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mitra Shams
+0.014better than expected — took 47% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.