← Search

Mitra Shams

Sammamish, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
153 matches · 96W–57L · seasons 2019–2025
Where Mitra sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Mitra is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mitra has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5201920202021202220232025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Mitra has gone from the 89th to the 87th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
77.6%
52W–15L · 64% of games
3.5
32.5%
13W–27L · 44.2% of games
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 67.6% of games
7.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
73.1%
19W–7L · 59.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history153 matches
W
Ge Wang
2025-09-21 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.022better than expected — took 72% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
Rina Adams
2025-08-14 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.051better than expected — took 75% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
Molly Mcintosh
2025-07-31 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.081below expectation — took 33% of games against 66% expected
7-5, 3-0
W
Anuradha Nandagiri
2025-07-24 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.013better than expected — took 80% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Helen Fan
2025-06-01 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.028below expectation — took 59% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2025-04-18 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.056below expectation — took 45% of games against 65% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-04-15 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.038below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-04-13 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.010better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-04-10 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.038below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Katherine Kim
2025-04-04 · #1 Singles · 3.0
−0.035below expectation — took 67% of games against 73% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Rebecca DeGeorge
2025-04-03 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.049better than expected — took 100% of games against 66% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-04-03 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.005about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.