← Search

Mitra Shams

Sammamish, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 100W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mitra Shams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
W
2026-06-06 · EDG-Chickies-Fawcett · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gina Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-03-20 · #2 Doubles · with Amy Higgins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-14 · EDG-Chickies-Fawcett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-28 · EDG-Chickies-Fawcett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gina Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-01 · EDG-Chickies-Fawcett · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-23 · EDG-Chickies-Fawcett · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gina Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-11-15 · EDG-Mixedologists-Kirkegaard · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stan Debiec mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2025-10-25 · EDG-Higgins · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Shimizu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-10-19 · EDG-Higgins · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brook Koski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-03 · EDG-Higgins · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gina Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-09-21 · mitra shams · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2025-09-20 · EDG-Higgins · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Gina Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
75%
54W–18L · 63% of games
3.5
32.5%
13W–27L · 44.2% of games
6.0
70%
7W–3L · 63.2% of games
7.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
67.9%
19W–9L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 51% of the time
#1 Singles
51%
84 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
18 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal