← Search

Stan Debiec

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 4W–10L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history14 matches
L
2026-10-16 · EDG-Baby Got Backhand-Johnson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nicole Carrido mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-10-02 · EDG-Baby Got Backhand-Johnson · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brook Koski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-26 · EDG-Long · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Riesa Ragan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-03 · EDG-Warriors-Moosman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Hei
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-27 · EDG-Warriors-Moosman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paul Moosman
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-15 · EDG-Mixedologists-Kirkegaard · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mitra Shams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-7
W
2025-11-09 · EDG-Mixedologists-Kirkegaard · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carmen Pong mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-10-12 · EDG-Mixedologists-Kirkegaard · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nicole Lew mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-28 · EDG-Mixedologists-Kirkegaard · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nicole Lew mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-07 · EDG-Mixedologists-Kirkegaard · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mitra Shams mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2024-03-09 · EDG-Mavericks-Auffant · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tim Tao
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-02-04 · EDG-Mavericks-Auffant · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adrian Fenesan
loading the estimate
6-3, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams5 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.3% of games
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert