← Search

Jolene Rhodes

Auburn, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 57W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jolene Rhodes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-07-12 · BETC-All Mixed Up-Truong · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jake Lim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-26 · BETC-All Mixed Up-Truong · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jake Lim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-21 · JTC-Villalobos-Double Set Point · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Kozuma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-06-20 · JTC-Villalobos-Double Set Point · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Kozuma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-05-03 · LRC-Villalobos-Asian Tsunami · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clemente Villalobos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-04-19 · LRC-Villalobos-Asian Tsunami · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barry Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
April Victor / Winferd Baker
2025-04-13 · LRC-Villalobos-Asian Tsunami · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Zheng Ge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-03-23 · LRC-Villalobos-Asian Tsunami · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Zheng Ge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-03-16 · LRC-Villalobos-Asian Tsunami · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clemente Villalobos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-03-15 · GTC-Neeley/Cook-Too Much · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Escame-Hedger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-03-02 · GTC-Neeley/Cook-Too Much · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Escame-Hedger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-03-01 · GTC-Neeley/Cook-Too Much · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hwayoung Srein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 61.9% of games
3.0
58.1%
18W–13L · 53.1% of games
3.5
32.6%
14W–29L · 43.6% of games
6.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 48.1% of games
7.0mixed
37%
10W–17L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 50% of the time
#1 Doubles
50%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
24 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe