← Search

Michael Davis

Olympia, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 91W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michael Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Jerry Saul championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Jim Clerget championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Victor Andrade championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-08 · SWW-VAC-McKay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Schrank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-03 · SWW-VAC-McKay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Schrank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · SWW-VAC-McKay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Schrank mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-04-12 · VAC-Huffman · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Colleen Sharkey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-04-11 · SWW-VAC-McKay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathi McKay mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-15 · #3 Doubles · with Colleen Sharkey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6
W
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · with Colleen Sharkey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Tom Heiting / Barbara Starnes
2026-03-13 · #2 Doubles · with Colleen Sharkey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-08 · VAC-Clerget · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Clerget
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
70.2%
33W–14L · 60% of games
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 40.6% of games
7.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 57.4% of games
8.0
100%
6W–0L · 68.7% of games
7.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 54.4% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
61 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
26 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova