← Search

Pam Butterfield

Federal Way, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 75W–82L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Pam Butterfield to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
L
2026-09-13 · GTC-Chan-Flying Eagles · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Lockett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-01 · JTC-Villalobos-Double Set Point · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Kozuma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · JTC-Villalobos-Double Set Point · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clemente Villalobos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-11 · JTC-Villalobos-Double Set Point · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Stetter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · BETC-Schiller · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Lockett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-22 · BETC-Ladies of the Net-Ferrera · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Lockett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-22 · BETC-Schiller · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Lockett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · BETC-Ladies of the Net-Ferrera · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Lockett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-11 · SWW-JTC-Villalobos · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Kozuma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-04 · BETC-Schiller · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Lockett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-03-22 · SWW-JTC-Villalobos · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clemente Villalobos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-03-21 · SWW-JTC-Villalobos · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Kozuma mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
52%
13W–12L · 49.3% of games
4.0
37%
17W–29L · 44.8% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
15W–15L · 50.4% of games
8.0
53.7%
22W–19L · 51.3% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
30 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert