← Search

Anneke Berry

Lakewood, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
252 matches · 129W–123L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Anneke Berry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history252 matches
W
Melinda Rowan / Lisa Smith
2026-09-13 · LRC-Moll-Lakewood Ladies · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristi Gonzalez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-11 · LRC-Barnes-Lakewood Lobsters · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Johnsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-09 · GTC-Westfall-Better with Age · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Coovert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-08-08 · LRC-Berry · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kevin Andry mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-26 · GTC-Westfall-Better with Age · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Mar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-07-12 · GTC-Westfall-Better with Age · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Mar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-14 · LRC-Berry · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Florian Purganan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · GTC-Westfall-Better with Age · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Corey West mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-12 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-10 · LRC-Hudson/Berry · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Corinne Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
61.9%
60W–37L · 56.7% of games
4.0
31.8%
14W–30L · 43.2% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 61.3% of games
6.0mixed
50%
12W–12L · 48.2% of games
7.0mixed
52.9%
18W–16L · 53.4% of games
8.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
92 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
81 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
54 matches
#1 Singles
5%
13 matches
#2 Singles
3%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal