← Search

Jill Hancock

Kirkland, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
237 matches · 143W–94L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jill Hancock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history237 matches
W
2026-09-13 · BC-Perkins · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-09 · BC-Hancock · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chris Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-06 · Hancock/Ritchie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · Hancock/Ritchie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-31 · Hancock/Ritchie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-26 · BC-Clemente · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kwang Kim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · BC-Hancock · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brett Hartzell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-21 · Hancock/Ritchie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Ritchie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-2
W
2026-07-10 · Hancock/Ritchie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Ritchie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-07 · Hancock/Ritchie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Ritchie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-06 · Hancock/Ritchie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christie Ritchie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-05 · BC-Clemente · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bruce Seeley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
81.1%
30W–7L · 60.5% of games
3.5
54.5%
42W–35L · 51.3% of games
6.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 57.5% of games
7.0
60.9%
14W–9L · 54.1% of games
6.0mixed
58.3%
14W–10L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
41.9%
18W–25L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
83 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
75 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer