Search

Lyrma Santodomingo

Redmond, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
181 matches · 101W–80L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.29
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Redmond · 3.5
24 of 43
WA · 3.5
600 of 1209

Lyrma is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Lyrma has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Lyrma has gone from the 16th to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
70.2%
40W–17L · 58.2% of games
3.5
54.5%
36W–30L · 51.5% of games
7.0
25%
2W–6L · 43.5% of games
6.0mixed
53.6%
15W–13L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history181 matches
L
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie van Zyl
0.046below expectation — took 25% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie van Zyl
0.033below expectation — took 45% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Everett Seven
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie van Zyl
+0.060better than expected — took 71% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Erica Wiechers / Amy Enns-Ford
2026-04-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Buck
0.033below expectation — took 29% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Aki Carroll / Jamie Lampitt
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Mackey
+0.007better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-09-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginny Larsen
+0.018about as expected — took 32% of games against 31% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2025-09-20 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginny Larsen
0.029below expectation — took 43% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Anne Diaw / Jamie Williams
2025-09-13 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Casey
0.021below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Everett Seven
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginny Larsen
+0.027better than expected — took 65% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Bifford
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.