← Search

Everett Seven

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
196 matches · 98W–98L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.08
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
15%
down to 3.0
85%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 10% down · 90% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.10. Higher than today’s 3.08 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
246 of 256
WA · 3.5
1137 of 1209

Everett is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Everett has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 6.0, Everett has gone from the 28th to the 95th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
58.3%
21W–15L · 54.5% of games
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 47.6% of games
6.0
64.7%
22W–12L · 56.3% of games
7.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 49.7% of games
6.0mixed
54.2%
26W–22L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
27.3%
6W–16L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history196 matches
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elena Ivanova
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suanty Kaghan
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mikhaila Reudink
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ginny Larsen
+0.000about as expected — took 43% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lyrma Santodomingo
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Hovey
+0.000better than expected — took 42% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Brandon Hahn / John Tully
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Ehrlich
+0.014better than expected — took 57% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Eric Cobb / Cyrus Ebnesajjad
2026-04-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Ehrlich
−0.006about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Kyle Rutherford / Juan Lopez
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Lee
−0.015below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Ian Brown / Chris Joneschamps
2025-12-06 · #1 Doubles · with James Roma
−0.024below expectation — took 47% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Elia Bishara / Jocelyn Hsumixed
2025-11-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Olga Moshchuk
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Bethany Brown / Paul Cabellonmixed
2025-11-09 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jacky Grotle
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.