← Search

SHREERAJ SUTARIA

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
80 matches · 34W–46L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.31
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
126 of 256
WA · 3.5
522 of 1209

SHREERAJ is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

SHREERAJ has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, SHREERAJ has gone from the 42nd to the 22nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.8% of games
3.5
51%
26W–25L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
22.7%
5W–17L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history80 matches
W
Mart Salvino
2026-07-27 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.047better than expected — took 67% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pamela Lavitt
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.010about as expected — took 46% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirley Chow
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Asha DSouza / Danny Dubrowmixed
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shirley Chow
+0.000about as expected — took 58% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Keith Green
2026-06-17 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.044below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Anna Hundt / Ben Perkowskimixed
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Schmid
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Ashwin Ravichandran
2026-06-03 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.018below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Yong Park
2026-05-14 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.039better than expected — took 53% of games against 38% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Simon Zhang / Xudong Li
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Kim
−0.028below expectation — took 35% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Derrick Robb
2026-05-09 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.018better than expected — took 67% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Zimbelman
+0.006about as expected — took 52% of games against 50% expected
6-7, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.