← Search

Pamela Lavitt

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
122 matches · 64W–58L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.26
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
100%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
157 of 256
WA · 3.5
675 of 1209

Pamela is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Pamela has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Pamela has gone from the 53rd to the 83rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 52.8% of games
3.0
59.6%
34W–23L · 55.3% of games
3.5
21.4%
3W–11L · 44.6% of games
4.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 33.3% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 51.7% of games
6.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.2% of games
7.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 61.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-07-29 · #1 Female Singles · 0.0
+0.103better than expected — took 55% of games against 29% expected
6-5
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with SHREERAJ SUTARIA
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Kaitlyn Casimo
−0.030below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-1
W
Pamela Schwartz / Seth Schwartzmixed
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Kim
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 50% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Minas Ter-Galstyan / Liza Minasyanmixed
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ajay Radhakrishnan
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-30 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.023below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Xinlu Tu
2026-05-24 · #1 Singles · 3.5
−0.069below expectation — took 29% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-22 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.065better than expected — took 35% of games against 16% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Leilani Caldwell
2026-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.020better than expected — took 86% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-15 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.039better than expected — took 28% of games against 21% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
Upasna Suman
2026-05-02 · #2 Singles · 3.5
−0.046below expectation — took 43% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-24 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.013below expectation — took 20% of games against 26% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.