Teams

NTC-The Maude Squad-Reudink

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-22vs NWW-MI-HenseyLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulia Pollock / Beth Rossi vs Denise Chen / Helen Kelly2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJean Bryant / Pam MacDuff vs Doreen Kiss / Naomi Knight3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMikhaila Reudink / Monica Blum vs Beth Garr / Angelisa Paladin1-6, 4-6
2025-11-02vs BC-Vintage-WebberMeeksLost 12
L#1 DoublesSherri Johnson / Kirsten Graham vs Dana Landry / Lauren Fisher3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPam MacDuff / Jean Bryant vs Michelle Watson / Gina Gentry3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChristi Nagle / Mikhaila Reudink vs Nancy Porter / Joanne Hasbrook6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-19vs CAC/SL-Love Love Us-CareyLost 03
L#1 DoublesVenus Velazquez / Pamela Lavitt vs Jill Borgida / Joan Wilson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Johnson / Sherri Johnson vs Holly Anderson / Kim Carey2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMikhaila Reudink / Monica Blum vs Jinhee Park / Michele Soelling0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-18vs TCSP-Serve Me a Double-PalmerWon 30
W#1 DoublesPam MacDuff / Jean Bryant vs Beth Mullin / Kristen Schriver6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKirsten Graham / Sherri Johnson vs Patricia Keegan / Valerie Gilbert7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMonica Blum / Theresa Roberts vs Lesley Burvill Holmes / Sue Matyas6-3, 4-4
2025-10-12vs RTC-HansberryWon 30
W#1 DoublesMegan Johnson / Stacey Campbell vs Smaranda Lieuallen / Melanie Gerard6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulia Pollock / Beth Rossi vs Tami DeVita / Kristen Mosebar6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSara Shelton / Christi Nagle vs Anu Ganesan / Debra Simmonds6-0, 6-2
2025-09-28vs STC-Tightly Strung-MulbergWon 21
W#1 DoublesTheresa Roberts / Jean Bryant vs Shelley Morrison / Mary Battison6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPam MacDuff / Sara Shelton vs Celia Evans / Jennifer Ederer3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMonica Blum / Mikhaila Reudink vs Jeanne Sommerville / Lynne Parrott6-3, 6-4
2025-09-21vs RBW-Howe Many Shots-MurphyWon 30
W#1 DoublesJulia Pollock / Beth Rossi vs Ellen Murphy / Antonette Wood7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJean Bryant / Megan Johnson vs Leona De Rocco / Cindy Paborsky6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesVenus Velazquez / Pamela Lavitt vs Karen Kelly / Natalie Delbrueck6-3, 6-2
2025-09-14vs EDG-KoskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesKirsten Graham / Christi Nagle vs Carmen Pong / Kaori Yamada3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMikhaila Reudink / Stacey Campbell vs Amy Higgins / Sharon Kay6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesVenus Velazquez / Pamela Lavitt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Venus Velazquez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Beth Rossi
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.46
Julia Pollock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.39
Jean Bryant
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.36
Stacey Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.29
Pam MacDuff
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3.5
3.28
Monica Blum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Christi Nagle
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Theresa Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Sara Shelton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Mikhaila Reudink
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Kirsten Graham
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.09
Sherri Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Pamela Lavitt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.91
Megan Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christi Nagle + Jean Bryant5167% games+11.8% vs expected
Pam MacDuff + Monica Blum3354% games+3.4% vs expected
Christi Nagle + Megan Johnson5357% games+2.6% vs expected
Theresa Roberts + Megan Johnson10953% games+2.1% vs expected
Pam MacDuff + Kirsten Graham121449% games+0.6% vs expected
Beth Rossi + Julia Pollock8457% games−1.9% vs expected
Megan Johnson + Monica Blum5548% games−3.6% vs expected
Pam MacDuff + Jean Bryant4644% games−4.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Venus Velazquez
15W–49L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Beth Rossi
81W–55L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Julia Pollock
174W–122L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Jean Bryant
34W–35L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%77%22%
3.39
3.5
Stacey Campbell
52W–46L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Pam MacDuff
146W–163L career · 11 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Monica Blum
105W–100L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Christi Nagle
34W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Theresa Roberts
43W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Sara Shelton
23W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Mikhaila Reudink
134W–97L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Kirsten Graham
94W–92L career · 9 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Sherri Johnson
65W–91L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Pamela Lavitt
66W–59L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Megan Johnson
101W–87L career · 5 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.