Search

Kirsten Graham

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
180 matches · 90W–90L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.31
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 32 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
129 of 256
WA · 3.5
533 of 1209

Kirsten is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kirsten has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Kirsten has gone from the 11th to the 48th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
3.0
55.2%
16W–13L · 52.6% of games
3.5
50%
48W–48L · 49.9% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 52.8% of games
8.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 38.8% of games
7.0mixed
57.9%
11W–8L · 52.7% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history180 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Howard Shalinsky
+0.000better than expected — took 45% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Guy Jang / Andrea Escame-Hedgermixed
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ra'Id Khalil
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Howard Shalinsky
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dean Ciano
+0.000below expectation — took 45% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam MacDuff
0.007below expectation — took 33% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Hill
+0.009better than expected — took 67% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Christy Carr / Becky Hutt
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bree Olofson
0.025below expectation — took 44% of games against 55% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dean Ciano
+0.000below expectation — took 48% of games against 61% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Miwa Nagai / Daye Chung
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Hill
0.004about as expected — took 48% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
Theresa Maloney / Hanley Cahoon
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Hill
+0.094better than expected — took 92% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Chandra Pandey / Mary Jean Waite
2026-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Hill
+0.020better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Erin Park / Jingjing Cai
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bree Olofson
0.001about as expected — took 62% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.