← Search

Barry Strand

Sammamish, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
180 matches · 101W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Barry Strand to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history180 matches
W
2026-08-02 · EDG-The Young Once-Li · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brook Koski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · EDG-Hit & Run-Hei · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sharon Jaeger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-20 · EDG-Hit & Run-Hei · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Debiec mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-19 · EDG-DoubleEdgers-Huang · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Juhn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-14 · EDG-The Young Once-Li · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brook Koski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-13 · EDG-DoubleEdgers-Huang · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lainie Dickson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · EDG-Alcohooligans 4.0-Cook · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wayne Hwang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-31 · EDG-Alcohooligans 4.0-Cook · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-23 · EDG-Alcohooligans 4.0-Cook · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-24 · EDG-Alcohooligans 4.0-Cook · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Dickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-11 · EDG-Alcohooligans 4.0-Cook · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-28 · EDG-Alcohooligans 4.0-Cook · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
74.6%
44W–15L · 56.9% of games
4.0
32.1%
9W–19L · 47.7% of games
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.4% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
46.3%
19W–22L · 49.5% of games
8.0mixed
36.7%
11W–19L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
46 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal