Search

David Hasbrook

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
100 matches · 46W–54L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.96
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 30 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
68%
stay 3.0
32%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 92% stay · 8% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.89. Lower than today’s 2.96 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
25 of 63
WA · 3.0
315 of 755

David is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

David has been 3.0 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, David has gone from the 56th to the 33rd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
42.9%
12W–16L · 50.3% of games
6.0
60%
12W–8L · 50.3% of games
7.0
20%
2W–8L · 44% of games
6.0mixed
58.1%
18W–13L · 55.3% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 29.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katrina Fleming
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Quinn Zakahi / Leo Liuchamps
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Kevin McNeil
0.024below expectation — took 33% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Rick Downey / Bill McKenzie
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Manning
+0.049better than expected — took 57% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Huameng Jiang / Canzhou Qu
2026-06-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Lee
0.049below expectation — took 20% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Mike Rasanen / Dick Lunceford
2026-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Manning
0.057below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Mark Henninger / Dean Strong
2026-06-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Tursa
0.057below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Kim Henderson / AL King
2026-05-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Snyder
+0.022better than expected — took 52% of games against 41% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Frank Weathers / Bob Wyda
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Robinson
+0.047better than expected — took 43% of games against 28% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
David Bradlee / Howard Choder
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Robinson
+0.038better than expected — took 75% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Mark West / Geoff Lieberman
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Robinson
+0.005about as expected — took 59% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Daniel Martin / Douglas Mclennan
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Robinson
0.004about as expected — took 59% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
Dick Lunceford / Mike Rasanen
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Kroese
+0.012better than expected — took 56% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.