Teams

BC-Hitmen-Smith

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 2.96 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-15vs EDG-Warriors-MoosmanLost 13
W#1 DoublesChase Costello / Jared Oren vs Aaron Horton / Vijay Dasari6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMichael Wang vs Andy Zollers1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrad Smith / Scott Manning vs Ticson MacH / Matt Kempf0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Manning / David Hasbrook vs Paul Moosman / Darren Carrido3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-08vs TCSP-Turn and Burn-PratleyLost 13
W#1 DoublesChase Costello / Stephen Waltar vs Mark Lewin / Matthew Thomas Allen6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMichael Wang vs Andrew Buhayar6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Klutznick / Kevin McNeil vs Sachin Chouksey / Remi Dargent0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesScott Manning / David Howell vs Byron Rakitzis / Travis Glover1-6, 3-6
2026-02-28vs ETC-NetFlicks-LiSplit 22
W#1 DoublesChase Costello / Jason Eggebrecht vs Han Zhao / Kyle Peterson6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Wang vs Yang Chen6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoseph Holmes / David Hasbrook vs Mihai Popoaei / Chi Yi4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJared Oren / John Manning vs WENSI LI / Zhe Zhang6-1, 6-2
2026-02-22vs CP-Racquet-Rascals-KesavWon 40
W#1 DoublesChase Costello / Stephen Waltar vs Atanas Koralski / Markus Mielke6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJason Eggebrecht vs Yonggang Deng6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Klutznick / Kevin McNeil vs Mark LeMaster / Jeffrey Merrifield6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJared Oren / Joseph Holmes vs Jeff Trager / Kit Merker6-0, 6-0
2026-02-15vs PL-ThakerSplit 22
W#1 DoublesChase Costello / Jason Eggebrecht vs Sunil Tahilramani / Gaurav Tandon7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMichael Wang vs Nik Garkusha1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJared Oren / Joseph Holmes vs Mikel Morrow / Amit Kejriwal5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStephen Waltar / David Hasbrook vs Arif Murshed / Thomas Nilsson6-2, 7-6
2026-01-24vs MI-WolfeSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJason Eggebrecht / Chase Costello vs Steve Ying / Marc Munson7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMichael Wang vs Mario Kosmiskas4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMatthew Klutznick / Kevin McNeil vs Bharat Maheshwari / Ken Wolfe6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrad Smith / Scott Manning vs Bryan Goode / Tom Bice0-6, 1-6
2026-01-18vs JTC-Mir Arenas/RacineLost 12
W#1 DoublesStephen Waltar / Kevin McNeil vs Bryson Huie / Scott Monson6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrad Smith / David Hasbrook vs Scott Lane / Lupe Gonzales4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Manning / David Howell vs Dan Slaton / Mike Rayburn3-6, 1-6
2026-01-11vs AYTC-ThompsonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJason Eggebrecht / Chase Costello vs Matt MacArthur / Daniel Chua6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMichael Wang vs Manuel Moises6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesScott Manning / Jared Oren vs Tunde Adams / Dustin Ong7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMatthew Klutznick / Joseph Holmes vs Terrance Creighton / James Thompson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Michael Wang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.05
Jason Eggebrecht
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.98
Kevin McNeil
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.97
Brad Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Chase Costello
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.87
Jared Oren
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.82
Stephen Waltar
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Matthew Klutznick
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Joseph Holmes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
David Howell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Rick Hancock
published 3
2.74
David Hasbrook
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.61
Scott Manning
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.46
John Manning
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Hasbrook + Stephen Waltar5169% games+12.3% vs expected
Matthew Klutznick + Kevin McNeil7270% games+8.0% vs expected
Jared Oren + Chase Costello8163% games+6.2% vs expected
Joseph Holmes + Stephen Waltar5255% games−0.0% vs expected
Joseph Holmes + Matthew Klutznick2352% games−0.9% vs expected
Matthew Klutznick + Chase Costello5251% games−6.8% vs expected
Stephen Waltar + Chase Costello2446% games−9.0% vs expected
Brad Smith + David Hasbrook2338% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Michael Wang
26W–29L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.16
Jason Eggebrecht
24W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Kevin McNeil
63W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Brad Smith
22W–42L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Chase Costello
58W–22L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.88
3
Jared Oren
26W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Stephen Waltar
28W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Matthew Klutznick
45W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Joseph Holmes
35W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
David Howell
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Rick Hancock
62W–40L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
David Hasbrook
46W–55L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Scott Manning
17W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
2.5
John Manning
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%62%38%
2.46

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.