Search

Geoff Lieberman

Mercer Island, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
74 matches · 33W–41L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.83
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 3.0
10 of 13
WA · 3.0
622 of 960

Geoff is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Geoff has been a steady 3.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

2.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Geoff has gone from the 95th to the 96th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
0%
0W–4L · 27.9% of games
3.0
76.2%
16W–5L · 63.4% of games
6.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 49.6% of games
7.0
25%
5W–15L · 40.8% of games
6.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history74 matches
L
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rick Downey
0.011about as expected — took 46% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 0-6, 1-0
W
Harry Wang / Xiaohu Liu
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Troy Schell
0.014below expectation — took 55% of games against 60% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark West
0.010below expectation — took 41% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Jerry Osborn / Gough Chan
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manny McBride
+0.013better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
James Choi / Nicholas Sherman
2026-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark West
+0.007about as expected — took 38% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Philip Laue / Ian Warner
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ravi Moonka
+0.047better than expected — took 65% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 7-6
W
Douglas Mclennan / Brad Raynor
2026-04-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark West
0.001about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark West
+0.051better than expected — took 100% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-11-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Bove
0.073below expectation — took 20% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-10-24 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bernard Hensey
0.014below expectation — took 25% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Gregory Malley / Matthew Aalfs
2025-09-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Selby
0.007about as expected — took 43% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
William Manson / Yun Hong
2025-08-21 · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with DAVID MATYAS
+0.023about as expected — took 25% of games against 25% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.