Search

Atsushi Yoshida

Kirkland, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
47 matches · 16W–31L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.12
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
7%
down to 3.0
93%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 3.5
44 of 52
WA · 3.5
1173 of 1364

Atsushi is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Atsushi has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2020, 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Atsushi has gone from the 31st to the 12th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
31.7%
13W–28L · 42.5% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history47 matches
L
2026-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Justin VonGortler
+0.005below expectation — took 14% of games against 25% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Niket Thakkar / Martin Krimmel
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alessandro Contenti
+0.032better than expected — took 63% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Matthew Scott / Tunde Adams
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Justin VonGortler
+0.013better than expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tony Balkan - *
+0.032better than expected — took 63% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Atanas Koralski - *
0.038below expectation — took 8% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Chris Moore / Timothy Kniffin
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason LeeKeenan
0.043below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Gokul Venkatesan / Hilario Koyama
2026-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Tameishi
+0.038better than expected — took 59% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-02-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Tameishi
0.059below expectation — took 25% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juan Lopez
0.029below expectation — took 38% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2025-11-16 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Rainey
+0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-11-02 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Justin VonGortler
+0.073better than expected — took 80% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Chris Nelson / Brad Smith
2025-10-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Rainey
0.012about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.