← Search

Sanjiv Parikh

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
94 matches · 33W–61L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.17
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 3.5
53 of 63
WA · 3.5
951 of 1209

Sanjiv is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sanjiv has been a steady 3.5 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Sanjiv has gone from the 60th to the 17th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
43.8%
21W–27L · 46.6% of games
7.0
50%
11W–11L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
4.2%
1W–23L · 33.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history94 matches
L
Steve Ikeda / Clifford Hopps
2026-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gregory Norden
+0.003about as expected — took 47% of games against 45% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Scott Leonardson / Mart Salvino
2026-05-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven DeGracia
−0.038below expectation — took 20% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Aliak Shchurko / Jerico Factor
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven DeGracia
+0.023better than expected — took 63% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-25 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gary Pollastro
−0.014below expectation — took 53% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
Myunggeun Song / Matthew Scher
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Goode
+0.011about as expected — took 29% of games against 32% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Sushant Mantri / Roshan Picardo
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bryan Goode
−0.005below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
John Jones / Martin Krimmel
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlie Mills
−0.025below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Atsushi Yoshida / Tony Balkan - *
2026-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dean Wilson
−0.032below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Nordale
−0.020below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 4-4
W
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Gaberman
+0.034better than expected — took 86% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevin Peck
−0.017below expectation — took 41% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Matthew Klutznick / Paul Snyder
2025-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dean Wilson
−0.011about as expected — took 65% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.