Search

Matthew Klutznick

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
92 matches · 45W–47L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.89
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
92%
stay 3.0
8%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.83. Lower than today’s 2.89 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
42 of 82
WA · 3.0
522 of 960

Matthew is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Matthew has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Matthew has gone from the 22nd to the 95th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
54.7%
29W–24L · 51.8% of games
6.0
20%
1W–4L · 39.3% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
48.4%
15W–16L · 50.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history92 matches
L
Michelle Warren / Jonathan Warrenmixed
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jenn Gile
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jenn Gile
+0.000about as expected — took 58% of games against 60% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Tillman
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · with Kevin McNeil
0.040below expectation — took 38% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Joseph Carter / Sanjay Chopra
2026-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michael Morgan
+0.029better than expected — took 59% of games against 46% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Mark Lewin / Cat Zimmermann
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Holmes
+0.022better than expected — took 68% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Vu Nguyen Nguyen / Sakae Sakai
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin McNeil
+0.020better than expected — took 86% of games against 67% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Christopher Leyva Vera / Emanuel Quintero
2026-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin McNeil
0.008about as expected — took 71% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Sachin Chouksey / Remi Dargent
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin McNeil
0.069below expectation — took 38% of games against 65% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
Mark LeMaster / Jeffrey Merrifield
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin McNeil
+0.026better than expected — took 92% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Bharat Maheshwari / Ken Wolfe
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kevin McNeil
+0.032better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Terrance Creighton / James Thompson
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joseph Holmes
0.015below expectation — took 50% of games against 55% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.