Teams

BC-Hitmen-Smith

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-11-21vs NTC-Ball Machine-St De LoreWon 21
W#1 DoublesBruce Seeley / C Todd Rentschler vs Adam Hasson / John Toutonghi6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesStephen Waltar / David Hasbrook vs Jef St de Lore / James Modie5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesScott Manning / Dave Wilner vs Robert Arnesen / Scott Miller6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-11-15vs AYTC-Aces are Wild-EdwardsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBruce Seeley / C Todd Rentschler vs Evan Cohn / Michael King7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Hasbrook / David Robinson vs Tim Hanson / Mikel Morrow4-6, 3-6
2025-10-26vs AYTC-Aces are Wild-EdwardsLost 12
L#1 DoublesC Todd Rentschler / Joseph Holmes vs Everett Seven / Douglas Beck6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Klutznick / David Robinson vs James Roma / Mike Rayburn1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesStephen Waltar / Dave Wilner vs William Razeto / Mikel Morrow7-6, 7-5
2025-10-18vs WSC-LashWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoseph Holmes / C Todd Rentschler vs Tee Yokobe / Hiroya Okawa6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Hasbrook / Kevin McNeil vs Paul Bifford / Mark West7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrad Smith / David Robinson vs DAVID MATYAS / Ziran Lin7-6, 6-1
2025-10-11vs CAC/SL-MartinWon 20
W#1 DoublesBruce Seeley / David Hasbrook vs James Jovanovich / Brad Raynor6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRick Hancock / Dave Wilner vs Kim Smith / Kevin McMahan6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-04vs NWW-MC-GilkeyLost 12
W#1 DoublesBruce Seeley / Kevin McNeil vs Ray Hisayasu / Patrick Lawrence6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesC Todd Rentschler / David Robinson vs Galen Wickstrom / David Crisman2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Robinson / Joseph Holmes vs Mike Gilkey / Noel Balantac1-6, 1-6
2025-09-27vs NWW-MC-GilkeyLost 03
L#1 DoublesC Todd Rentschler / Joseph Holmes vs David Crisman / Galen Wickstrom3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrad Smith / David Robinson vs Matthew Berge / ZongJian Xiang4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRick Hancock / David Hasbrook vs Mike Gilkey / Noel Balantac1-6, 3-6
2025-09-14vs HBSQ-Rich 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesKevin McNeil / Matthew Klutznick vs Jeff Mcdowell / Trevor Mitchell6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesStephen Waltar / David Hasbrook vs Ryan Buma / Daryl Okamura6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrad Smith / Michael Robinson vs Richard Gould / Wink Thorne6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Luke Bienfang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Bruce Seeley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.98
Brad Smith
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.96
Kevin McNeil
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
David Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.83
Stephen Waltar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Matthew Klutznick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.78
C Todd Rentschler
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Michael Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Rick Hancock
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Joseph Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
David Hasbrook
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.64
Dave Wilner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Scott Manning
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Hasbrook + Stephen Waltar5169% games+13.0% vs expected
Matthew Klutznick + Kevin McNeil7270% games+7.7% vs expected
Bruce Seeley + Kevin McNeil6261% games+7.5% vs expected
David Robinson + David Hasbrook6651% games+4.1% vs expected
Joseph Holmes + Stephen Waltar5255% games−0.1% vs expected
Joseph Holmes + Matthew Klutznick2352% games−0.3% vs expected
David Hasbrook + Kevin McNeil2352% games−3.7% vs expected
Brad Smith + Bruce Seeley61343% games−4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Luke Bienfang
48W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Bruce Seeley
81W–63L career · type A · 8 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3
Brad Smith
22W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Kevin McNeil
63W–45L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
David Robinson
63W–64L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Stephen Waltar
28W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Matthew Klutznick
45W–47L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
C Todd Rentschler
24W–46L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Michael Robinson
38W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Rick Hancock
62W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Joseph Holmes
35W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
David Hasbrook
46W–55L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Dave Wilner
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.64
3
Scott Manning
17W–73L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.