← Search

Natalie Banks-Mendez

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 8W–11L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Natalie Banks-Mendez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
L
2026-09-12 · BC-Doubles2love-Sedghinasab · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Matthew Klutznick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-06 · McCallum · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gabby Klingman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-25 · BC-Doubles2Love-Sedghinasab · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kevin McNeil mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · BC-Doubles2Love-Sedghinasab · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kevin McNeil mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-22 · McCallum · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gabby Klingman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · McCallum · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-5
L
2026-05-27 · BC-Vogt · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Stabbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-22 · BC-Vogt · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kira Collins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-08 · BC-Vogt · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Antezana
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · BC-Slice Girls-D'Souza · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Renee Sedghinasab
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-03 · BC-Slice Girls-D'Souza · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Tillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
Chad Anderson / Tiffany Hicks
2025-11-22 · BC-Doubles2love-Sedghinasab · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephen Waltar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
50%
5W–5L · 49% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
6 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova