← Search

Lindsey Nelson

Renton, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 59W–30L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Lindsey Nelson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-09-11 · BC-Challengers-Mustur · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vikram Srinivasan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-28 · Summer-Social-BC-Farokhzad · #1 Female Singles · 0.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-5
W
2026-07-21 · Summer-Social-BC-Farokhzad · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Melissa Scott mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2
W
2026-07-14 · Summer-Social-BC-Farokhzad · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Annika Andrews mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4
W
2026-07-13 · McCallum · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey McCallum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6
W
2026-07-01 · Nelson · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-3
W
2026-06-21 · Nelson · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-5
L
2026-06-16 · McCallum · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Banks-Mendez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-5
L
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · with Sarah Jaquet championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-11 · McCallum · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey McCallum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · BC-Bloch · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · BC-Slay Sisters-McCullough · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolina DeHaan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.7% of games
3.0
64.7%
22W–12L · 54.9% of games
3.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 56.6% of games
0.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 64% of games
3.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 62.1% of games
6.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 47.8% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 30% of the time
#1 Singles
30%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
25 matches
#1 Female Singles
11%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
10 matches
#1 Female Doubles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams