← Search

Andrea Haines

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 25W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Andrea Haines to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Haines · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Ellen Moore championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Sets on the Beach · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-5
L
2026-07-23 · Haines · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-22 · Andrea and Ellen · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-3
W
2026-06-24 · Sets on the Beach · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hillary Higgins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Chandra Gordon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · Sets on the Beach · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chandra Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-16 · Sets on the Beach · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ellen Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · with Hillary Higgins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Hillary Higgins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · TCSP-Volley Llamas-Haines · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chandra Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
2.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 61.9% of games
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 54% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
14 matches
#1 Singles
36%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams