Teams

Sets on the Beach

2026 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-05vs WATT Happens on the CourtLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrea Haines / Ellen Moore vs Jacqueline True / Stephanie True7-6, 4-5
2026-07-15vs For FunziesWon 10
W#1 DoublesLiesel Schilperoort / Ellen Moore vs Julie Martin / Hannah Smolinski4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-14vs Code PinkWon 10
W#1 DoublesEllen Moore / Hillary Higgins vs Anne Roddy / Bekah Burdick7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-24vs Barrios-WoodsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Haines / Hillary Higgins vs Carrie Barrios / Alexis Wood6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2026-06-17vs Sumertime FunWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Haines / Chandra Gordon vs Wendy Champagne / Lois James6-0, 6-3
2026-06-16vs Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Haines / Ellen Moore vs Sarah Salemy / Alison MacBeth4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Liesel Schilperoort
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Ellen Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Andrea Haines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Hillary Higgins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Chandra Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hillary Higgins + Andrea Haines8252% games+5.3% vs expected
Ellen Moore + Andrea Haines2346% games−5.0% vs expected
Chandra Gordon + Andrea Haines314 matchesnot enough data
Hillary Higgins + Ellen Moore213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Liesel Schilperoort
29W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Ellen Moore
41W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Andrea Haines
25W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Hillary Higgins
23W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
2.5
Chandra Gordon
15W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.