Teams

For Funzies

2026 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-06vs WATT Happens on the CourtWon 10
W#1 DoublesAngela Wang / Hannah Smolinski vs Stephanie True / Jacqueline True6-3, 7-5
2026-07-30vs Barrios-WoodsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Martin / Angela Wang vs Carrie Barrios / Alexis Wood7-5, 5-5
2026-07-15vs Sets on the BeachLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Martin / Hannah Smolinski vs Liesel Schilperoort / Ellen Moore4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-10vs Sumertime FunLost 01
L#1 DoublesHannah Smolinski / Angela Wang vs Wendy Champagne / Lois James2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-09vs Code PinkWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Martin / Angela Wang vs Anne Roddy / Bekah Burdick6-1, 5-3
2026-06-19vs Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Martin / Hannah Smolinski vs Krista Davis / Alison MacBeth6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Julie Martin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Angela Wang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Hannah Smolinski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Martin + Hannah Smolinski4359% games+3.0% vs expected
Julie Martin + Angela Wang404 matchesnot enough data
Angela Wang + Hannah Smolinski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Julie Martin
48W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
3
Angela Wang
23W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Hannah Smolinski
19W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.