← Search

Julie Martin

Shoreline, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 48W–44L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Julie Martin to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-07-30 · For Funzies · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-5
L
2026-07-15 · For Funzies · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Smolinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · Martin · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-09 · For Funzies · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-3
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Hannah Smolinski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-19 · For Funzies · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Smolinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Naomi O'Leary championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Naomi O'Leary championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenni Clay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · HBSQ-Ace Ace Baby-Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Smolinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-15 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-12 · HBSQ-Ace Ace Baby-Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hannah Smolinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
60%
12W–8L · 56.1% of games
3.0
54.7%
29W–24L · 54.2% of games
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 44.5% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
14 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert