← Search

Naomi O'Leary

KIRKLAND, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 53W–45L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Naomi O'Leary to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
W
2026-09-12 · HBSQ-Hot Flashes-Brodersen · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Debbie Montgomery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Julie Martin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Julie Martin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angela Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-05-26 · HBSQ-Ace Ace Baby-Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-22 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jolanta Grigsby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-05-19 · HBSQ-Ace Ace Baby-Ikeda · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christie Vandyke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-15 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mee Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-22 · HBSQ-Ace Ace Baby-Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ali Jones - (DQ)
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-04-14 · HBSQ-Ace Ace Baby-Ikeda · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-10 · HBSQ-Brodersen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Santos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-04-25 · HBSQ-Pearl Slam-Arrigoni · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Chia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
72.4%
21W–8L · 57.2% of games
3.5
48.5%
16W–17L · 48.9% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
58.8%
10W–7L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 35% of the time
#3 Doubles
35%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
32 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert